PHYSICS@HORTON

Physics12

Physics 11

Math 11

NS Exams

Curriculum

Tips

Tutorials

McGraw Hill

Resources

Need it?

News

Enrichment

Giancoli

 

NS EXAMS

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

January

(solutions)

January

(solutions)

January

(solutions)

January

(solutions)

January

(solutions)

January

(solutions)

June

(solutions)

June

(solutions)

June

(solutions)

June

(solutions)

June

(solutions)

June

(solutions)

RECOMMENDED QUESTIONS FOR REVIEW

LINKS TO RESOURCE MATERIAL & TEACHER INFORMATION GUIDE & INFO for STUDENTS & PARENTS

 

For more practice, check out these Newfoundland Exams:

EXAMINERS' COMMENTS (full report of 2002 results)
*Many students did not attempt to answer all the examination questions.

*The majority of students did not clearly present their solutions or explanations.

*Frequently, there was little evidence of an organized approach or definite methodology for solving the problems presented by the examination questions.

*Few students produced a table of data from the text of the questions.

*Many students did not write an algebraic statement at the beginning of their solutions, nor did they reorganize algebraic expressions before values were replaced.

*Many students did not express dimensions (units) through their solutions.

*Vector analysis of dynamics cases, collisions, and fields were particularly weak.

*Students do not seem to recognize the usefulness of a large, scale diagram.

*A large number of students did not demonstrate the ability to successfully decode a question and to phrase a coherent response.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

{subdirectory}